Starting Sept. 5, 2014, Genealogy.com will be making a big change. GenForum message boards, Family Tree Maker homepages, and the most popular articles will be preserved in a read-only format, while several other features will no longer be available, including member subscriptions and the Shop.
 
Learn more


Chat | Daily Search | My GenForum | Community Standards | Terms of Service
Jump to Forum
Home: Surnames: Bates Family Genealogy Forum

Post FollowupReturn to Message ListingsPrint Message

Re: DAR Credibility Suffers in handlling Bates application - ask for details
Posted by: Wayne Witt Bates (ID *****7673) Date: April 22, 2011 at 10:55:08
In Reply to: DAR Credibility Suffers in handlling Bates application - ask for details by Wayne Witt Bates of 8062

DAR HOLDS BATES IN LIMBO
Despite irrefutable evidence, DAR continues to withhold
honors due Rev. War Soldier Reuben Bates Sr (1731-1800)
of Louisa Co., VA.

IRREFUTABLE FACTS

1       Page 94 War Vol. 4 (Service Record)
       Bates, Reuben - Soldier of the Infantry - paid by Mr. Duval on March 4, 1783 -36.0.0

       Mister Duval, who picked up pay due Reuben Bates in 1783, was the only Duval in Louisa Co., VA in 1783 (per Tax Record sent to DAR)

2.        Quoting DAR Web Site
       "Service probably belongs to this man's (Reuben Bates, Junior) father."

3.        In the time frame (1775-1783), only four (4) Bates named Reuben in Virginia.

       a. Reuben Bates Senior (1731-1800) of Louisa Co., VA, (Duval picked up his pay)

       b. Reuben Bates, Junior (1771-1853) of Louisa Co., VA (descendant DNA donor)

        c. Reuben Bates (c1768-1814) of Culpeper Co., VA. (descendant DNA donor)

        d. Reuben Bates (conjured-up but disowned by DAR) from Loudoun Co., VA

CONCLUSION: Reuben Bates, Sr (1731-1800) was the only possible Reuben that fits the above Service Record

In view of the above irrefutable facts, request Reuben Bates, Sr. be released from Limbo, and his service record be honored

lIFTED FROM DAR MESSAGE TO WAYNE WITT BATES

DAR DON'T HAVE ENOUGH INFORMATION, THEY CLAIM?

There are three genealogists on our staff who are very knowledgeable about Continental Line service and the records concerning this service. Tom Ragusin is one of them and he is the person who is assigned to the paper. I asked the other two to review the service as submitted. They all agree that we just donít have enough information



Notify Administrator about this message?
Followups:

Post FollowupReturn to Message ListingsPrint Message

http://genforum.genealogy.com/bates/messages/7819.html
Search this forum:

Search all of GenForum:

Proximity matching
Add this forum to My GenForum Link to GenForum
Add Forum
Home |  Help |  About Us |  Site Index |  Jobs |  PRIVACY |  Affiliate
© 2007 The Generations Network