Re: Jacob Beeler, land ownership
-
In reply to:
Jacob Beeler, land ownership
Evelyn J Herron 8/13/14
Ms. Herron,
Diversion, diversion, instead of documentation, documentation, you gotta love this.....
1. You did not prove that Jacob Beeler 1750-1843 was anything but a fictitious "brother" of John Valentine Beeler 1737-1823. Please PROVE it incorrect*.
*If you are unable to prove this is a "real brother", the rest is nothing but speculation based on a similar last name and it has just been a hoax. We have not seen the word "opinion" used in any of the discussions for twenty years. It has been stated as "fact" based on so called "documentation", so we call it what it is, a hoax.
2. The Bible "record" used to "verify" the "brother" relationship and insinuations by Maxine in 2009 does not exist.
3. John Valentine Beeler 1737-1823 never had a brother named Jacob.
4. Jacob Beeler 1750-1843 never filed a North Carolina Territory Grant, ever.
5. Jacob Beeler 1750-1843 never appears on a single document with Jacob Beeler 1761-1842 until 1812.
6. Any dispute involving Benjamin A. Beeler 1794-1877 NEVER states in any documentation his relationship to anyone but Lucy and their four daughters.
7. There is an illegal V.A. marker for Jacob Beeler 1750-1843 in Beeler Cemetery, Bristol, TN.
8. The owner of the Jacob Beeler Rifle at the King's Mountain National Military Park Visitor's Center states it belonged to his family, Jacob Beeler 1761-1842. It has nothing whatever to do with a Jacob Beeler 1750-1843 or any of his family.
This list can go on and on.....
_______________________________________________________
All there is to do is show the documentation that contradicts ANY of the statements. Otherwise, it's still just a hoax going on for twenty years.
_______________________________________________________
Let us talk about curious: Have you obtained and read your copy of the Famous Beeler Family Bible?
Ms. Herron, silence to the above questions previously raised tells us what we have. Silence is really all that can be heard in your post.
The object of the post was "diversion", but.....
ALL the statements listed above, 1 thru 8, are TRUE and everyone knows what is going on here.
Thank you but the game is over and Ms. Herron, you really did help uncover the tale.
____________________________________________
_____________________________________________
I just cannot resist the following statement in YOUR post:
"This sale is curious because Jacob Bealor bought the same property much later "
Curious? Now that is a funny term to use!
Do you really believe a professional in the field can't understand what it means?
Neither one of you understand.
"Sale is curious" was in the "book" and noted by yours truly two years ago. Hawkins and Sullivan Counties?It happens all the time and means but one thing.
Thank you for posting the information Ms. Herron
More Replies:
-
Re: Jacob Beeler, land ownership
Evelyn J Herron 8/18/14
-
Re: Jacob Beeler, land ownership
Kenneth Parker 8/20/14
-
Re: Jacob Beeler, land ownership
Kenneth Parker 8/18/14
-
Re: Jacob Beeler, land ownership
Evelyn J Herron 8/29/14
-
Re: Jacob Beeler, land ownership
Evelyn J Herron 8/29/14
-
Re: Jacob Beeler, land ownership
Kenneth Parker 8/31/14
-
Re: Jacob Beeler, land ownership
Evelyn J Herron 9/24/14
-
Re: Jacob Beeler, land ownership
Kenneth Parker 9/25/14
-
Re: Jacob Beeler, land ownership
Evelyn J Herron 9/26/14
-
Re: Jacob Beeler, land ownership
-
Re: Jacob Beeler, land ownership
-
Re: Jacob Beeler, land ownership
-
Re: Jacob Beeler, land ownership
-
Re: Jacob Beeler, land ownership
Kenneth Parker 8/30/14
-
Re: Jacob Beeler, land ownership
Evelyn J Herron 9/01/14
-
Re: Jacob Beeler, land ownership
-
Re: Jacob Beeler, land ownership
-
Re: Jacob Beeler, land ownership
-
Re: Jacob Beeler, land ownership
Kenneth Parker 8/19/14
-
Re: Jacob Beeler, land ownership
Kenneth Parker 8/19/14
-
Re: Jacob Beeler, land ownership