|
|
Hi John: no, I hadn't seen that. There is always a chance its a family member, but according to what I have, my Martha Brindley would have been born earlier than that, maybe 20 years earlier? One of her daughters, Mary Leach, was supposed to have been born Feb 14? 1867. Thanks very much for posting that though. :-)) Maybe someone else will find that its just what they are looking for. Notify Administrator about this message?
|
|
|||||||||||||
| Home | Help | About Us | Site Index | Jobs | PRIVACY | Affiliate |
| © 2007 The Generations Network |