Starting Sept. 30, 2014, will be making a big change. GenForum message boards, Family Tree Maker homepages, and the most popular articles will be preserved in a read-only format, while several other features will no longer be available, including member subscriptions and the Shop.
Learn more

Chat | Daily Search | My GenForum | Community Standards | Terms of Service
Jump to Forum
Home: Surnames: Brindley Family Genealogy Forum

Post FollowupReturn to Message ListingsPrint Message

Brundelegh de Brundeley
Posted by: Noel Brindley (ID *****2559) Date: May 27, 2011 at 04:37:41
  of 608

If Gilbert de Stoke married Isolda Brereton in 1272, as I have read, and their son was the first Brindley, Brundelegh de Brundeley, who was the Richard de Brundeley mentioned below?

From Welsh Records Calendars of Deed, Inquisitions, and Writs of Dower, Enrolled on The Plea Rolls of The County of Chester.-Edward 2.
1311/12 (4th year of Edward IIs reign) Brundeley, Hugh son of Richard de, and Richard de Brundeley and Margery his wife. Fine 20 acres of land in Halghton. (4 & 5 Edw. 2. m. 2 d.)

So, in 1311/12 their was a Richard Brindley and his wife Margery and their son, Hugh. If Richard had a son who was old enough to be mentioned as receiving a fine alongside his parents, surely he must have come of age.
In this case did Richard and Margery marry about 20 years earlier, 1291 and was Richard therefore, born about 20 years prior to that, 1271?
This Richard must have been born at a similar time to Brundelegh de Brundeley, supposedly the first of that name unless Gilbert de Stoke and Isolda actually married much earlier.
By the way there is also a Robert de Brundeley mentioned at this time.

Any thoughts welcome

Notify Administrator about this message?

Post FollowupReturn to Message ListingsPrint Message
Search this forum:

Search all of GenForum:

Proximity matching
Add this forum to My GenForum Link to GenForum
Add Forum
Home |  Help |  About Us |  Site Index |  Jobs |  PRIVACY |  Affiliate
© 2007 The Generations Network