Oops, just noticed the discrepancy between the marriage date given for Charles and Catherine---March 17, 1629/30---and the birth for dau Mary---1616-1618. With her sister Sarah born in 1631, there's no room for Mary unless she was on the way when they married. Is that likely for a minister of those times? Another question is, if Mary was their first child, wouldn't they have wanted her to marry a minister as her sister Sarah did? The Loomis family hardly seems in the same league. Or, am I wrong?
Any other Loomis, Chauncy researchers find a plausible solution? Help, please.
|Home | Help | About Us | Site Index | Jobs | PRIVACY | Affiliate|
|© 2007 The Generations Network|