Big changes have come to Genealogy.com — all content is now read-only, and member subscriptions and the Shop have been discontinued.
 
Learn more


Chat | Daily Search | My GenForum | Community Standards | Terms of Service
Jump to Forum
Home: Surnames: Day Family Genealogy Forum

Post FollowupReturn to Message ListingsPrint Message

13 year old Richard Day born 1477 did not have a son in 1490
Posted by: Claudia Day (ID *****7042) Date: May 31, 2013 at 03:02:16
  of 8721

The age of puberty in the 19th century was 16 in boys. It seems medically unlikely the Richard Day born 1477 would have had a son Richard of Worfield in 1490.


Notify Administrator about this message?
Followups:
No followups yet

Post FollowupReturn to Message ListingsPrint Message

http://genforum.genealogy.com/day/messages/8696.html
Search this forum:

Search all of GenForum:

Proximity matching
Add this forum to My GenForum Link to GenForum
Add Forum
Home |  Help |  About Us |  Site Index |  Jobs |  PRIVACY |  Affiliate
© 2007 The Generations Network