Starting Sept. 5, 2014, will be making a big change. GenForum message boards, Family Tree Maker homepages, and the most popular articles will be preserved in a read-only format, while several other features will no longer be available, including member subscriptions and the Shop.
Learn more

Chat | Daily Search | My GenForum | Community Standards | Terms of Service
Jump to Forum
Home: Surnames: Diplock Family Genealogy Forum

Post FollowupReturn to Message ListingsPrint Message

Re: Ruth Jackson nee Diplock 1897/8 Eastbourne
Posted by: Kathleen Burgar (ID *****1714) Date: August 26, 2008 at 17:40:07
In Reply to: Ruth Jackson nee Diplock 1897/8 Eastbourne by Paul Brown of 54

the only Walter jackson living in East Bourne in 1901

1901 England Census

Name: Walter Diplock
Age: 44
Estimated Birth Year: abt 1857
Relation: Head
Gender: Male
Where born: Eastbourne, Sussex, England

Civil Parish: Eastbourne
Ecclesiastical parish: Christchurch
County/Island: Sussex
Country: England

Registration district: Eastbourne
Sub registration district: Eastbourne
ED, institution, or vessel: 28

Household schedule number: 151
Household Members: Name Age
Carrie Diplock 19 Furotone ?, Sussex
Walter Diplock 44 Eastbourne
John Ranall 60 boarder

Source Citation: Class: RG13; Piece: 883; Folio: 125; Page: 23.

Is Carrie really Ruth??? Carrie being a nickname??? No Carrie show on the Freebmd after 1875, but there is a Ruth born 1879 in Godstone District of Surrey

NOPE, Carrie turns out to be Caroline Lotte in 1891 census

Sorry no help,, Her name could be a second name or Nickname, her age could be wrong, the fathers name could be wrong or ?????

Notify Administrator about this message?
No followups yet

Post FollowupReturn to Message ListingsPrint Message
Search this forum:

Search all of GenForum:

Proximity matching
Add this forum to My GenForum Link to GenForum
Add Forum
Home |  Help |  About Us |  Site Index |  Jobs |  PRIVACY |  Affiliate
© 2007 The Generations Network