Starting Sept. 30, 2014, Genealogy.com will be making a big change. GenForum message boards, Family Tree Maker homepages, and the most popular articles will be preserved in a read-only format, while several other features will no longer be available, including member subscriptions and the Shop.
 
Learn more


Chat | Daily Search | My GenForum | Community Standards | Terms of Service
Jump to Forum
Home: Surnames: Doerr Family Genealogy Forum

Post FollowupReturn to Message ListingsPrint Message

John George DOERR? Philadelphia Born circa 1849 GER
Posted by: Vincent Summers (ID *****5184) Date: February 22, 2008 at 07:04:50
  of 273

Folks,

I am laying out, below, a hypothetical situation. This has not yet been proven, but it is reasonably possible...

There are a line of Frederick William DOERRs from IV, to II.
Now presumably the I exists, and, in fact, I find him in my data as Frederick DOERR. Trouble is, I never see a middle name listed. That is not too, too surprising, as if its failure to be seen doesn't mean it doesn't exist.

Now I see no absolutely proven father for Frederick DOERR of Philadelphia. Yet, I *do* see this family as a shoe-in:

1880:

John George DOER 31 GER Works In Brewery GER GER
Mary DOER Wife 25 GER Keeping House GER GER
Annie DOER Dau 4 PA GER GER
Lizie DOER Dau 2 PA GER GER
Emma DOER Dau 6M PA GER GER
Ernest FETTERS Other W 30 GER Works In Carpet Mill GER GER

[Note: Fetters may be Felters]

Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Family History Library Film 1255187
NA Film Number T9-1187
Page Number 604A

Now the 1900 also includes a Frederick and a William!
Separate names. Also a George. Now likely George would have been a John George JR. And it is conceivable that Frederick could have been a Frederick Something and William a William Something.

Frederick is listed as born: Dec 1888
William is listed as born: Dec 1885
Emma is not listed - likely marriage, possibly death.

In 1910, Frederick is not listed in the household. Likely because of marriage. And indeed, the one I seek was married 1906-1907.

This gives the earmarks of being the family of the one I seek. In fact, the middle name may never have existed, but the II, etc., may have been "awarded" by a successor along the way. "I" may simply have been Frederick, and perhaps because of close family ties - the existence of the brother William may have been honored in Frederick William II.

Can anyone verify/disprove any of this?

Thanks!
Vince Summers


Notify Administrator about this message?
Followups:

Post FollowupReturn to Message ListingsPrint Message

http://genforum.genealogy.com/doerr/messages/240.html
Search this forum:

Search all of GenForum:

Proximity matching
Add this forum to My GenForum Link to GenForum
Add Forum
Home |  Help |  About Us |  Site Index |  Jobs |  PRIVACY |  Affiliate
© 2007 The Generations Network