Big changes have come to Genealogy.com — all content is now read-only, and member subscriptions and the Shop have been discontinued.
 
Learn more


Chat | Daily Search | My GenForum | Community Standards | Terms of Service
Jump to Forum
Home: Surnames: Kingery Family Genealogy Forum

Post FollowupReturn to Message ListingsPrint Message

For Descendents of Michael b. 1822 & Sarah Jane Biddlecome Handley b. 1825
Posted by: B Biddlecome (ID *****4984) Date: August 16, 2006 at 22:19:20
  of 608

For several years, it was thought that this Sarah Jane Biddlecome was a daughter of Asher & Sarah Biddlecome; however, more recent evidence convinces me that she is more likely a daughter of Nathan & Elizabeth Rogers Biddlecome. If the documentation about Asher's daughter, Lucinda, is correct, then Sarah Jane and Lucinda were born within 6 months of each other. It would have been unlikely then, that a baby born 3 months prematurely would survive. That Sarah Jane would be a daughter of Nathan fits what we do know from census records.
This would have relevance for descendents of Michael and Sarah Jane Kingery. For further information, you may contact me.


Notify Administrator about this message?
Followups:

Post FollowupReturn to Message ListingsPrint Message

http://genforum.genealogy.com/kingery/messages/536.html
Search this forum:

Search all of GenForum:

Proximity matching
Add this forum to My GenForum Link to GenForum
Add Forum
Home |  Help |  About Us |  Site Index |  Jobs |  PRIVACY |  Affiliate
© 2007 The Generations Network