Re: James LOMAX England
-
In reply to:
Re: James LOMAX England
8/03/01
Lynda, Hope you can understand some of this, it is from my very rough copies, it was something that I didn’t know that I would want. Don’t take the dates as gospel.
Re 1851 Census index that I gave you,
Henry, Baptism 1845, son of J/M (Mary nee Mead)Can’t find him on 1881 census,
Emma , Bapism1850 Daug of J/M.
In 16/02/1800 Mary Mead Christened at Stannington Father Thomas Mead, Mother Mary Bullock.
Baptisms of some of the Must family.
1859, Claude (?),Walter & Elizabeth Musk,Stan,Lab.
?,Rose Rebecca, James & ?,Stan, Lab.
1862,Walter,John & Maria,Stan,Shoe-Maker.
1886 ,? May ,William & Caroline,Stan, Lab.
1892,Hector,James& Jane,Stan,Lab.
1892,Edith? Mary, George & Jane,BSE,Lab.
Just the 1891 Census to come and that is all I can help you with at the moment. Don’t hesitate if there is anything I can look up for you
Marion.
More Replies:
-
Re: James LOMAX England
8/05/01
-
Re: James LOMAX England
Marion Lomax 8/05/01
-
Re: James LOMAX England
Marion Lomax 8/05/01
-
Re: James LOMAX England
8/07/01
-
Re: James LOMAX England
8/07/01
-
Re: James LOMAX England
8/08/01
-
Re: James LOMAX England
Marion Lomax 8/09/01
-
Re: James LOMAX England
Marion Lomax 8/09/01
-
Re: James LOMAX England
8/09/01
-
Re: James LOMAX England
Marion Lomax 8/16/01
-
Re: James LOMAX England
8/16/01
-
Re: James LOMAX England
Marion Lomax 8/17/01
-
Re: James LOMAX England
8/18/01
-
Re: James LOMAX England
Marion Lomax 8/18/01
-
Re: James LOMAX England
8/18/01
-
Re: James LOMAX England
Marion Lomax 8/19/01
-
Re: James LOMAX England
8/19/01
-
Re: James LOMAX England
-
Re: James LOMAX England
-
Re: James LOMAX England
-
Re: James LOMAX England
-
Re: James LOMAX England
-
Re: James LOMAX England
-
Re: James LOMAX England
-
Re: James LOMAX England
-
Re: James LOMAX England
-
Re: James LOMAX England
-
Re: James LOMAX England
-
Re: James LOMAX England