Re: Hugh Mahurin b. 1665
-
In reply to:
Hugh Mahurin b. 1665
Jillian Appel 1/20/07
Jillian,
I don't think Hugh's parentage is known, primarily because of the lack of documentaion on his birthplace [Scotland or N. Ireland]. I think that Mary Campbell is a bit of speculation as well. There was a family of Campbells close by and they used the names Ebenezer and Othneil, as did the Mahurins. Part of the family also dropped the 'Ma' and changed to Hurin or Huron.
What's your Mahurin line?
Terry
[email protected]
More Replies:
-
Re: Hugh Mahurin b. 1665
Jillian Appel 4/08/09
-
Re: Hugh Mahurin b. 1665
Terry Prall 4/08/09
-
Re: Hugh Mahurin b. 1665
Jillian Appel 5/11/09
-
Re: Hugh Mahurin b. 1665
Terry Prall 5/11/09
-
Re: Hugh Mahurin b. 1665
Norman Mahurin 11/25/09
-
Re: Hugh Mahurin b. 1665
Terry Prall 11/25/09
-
Re: Hugh Mahurin b. 1665
Norman Mahurin 11/25/09
-
Re: Hugh Mahurin b. 1665
Terry Prall 11/25/09
-
Re: Hugh Mahurin b. 1665
Norman Mahurin 11/25/09
-
Re: Hugh Mahurin b. 1665
Terry Prall 11/25/09
-
Re: Hugh Mahurin b. 1665
Norman Mahurin 11/25/09
-
Re: Hugh Mahurin b. 1665
Terry Prall 11/25/09
-
Re: Hugh Mahurin b. 1665
Debra Fowler 4/08/10
-
Re: Hugh Mahurin b. 1665
Norman Mahurin 4/09/10
-
Re: Hugh Mahurin b. 1665
Sue Wacker 6/12/11
-
Re: Hugh Mahurin b. 1665
Norman Mahurin 6/12/11
-
Re: Hugh Mahurin b. 1665
-
Re: Hugh Mahurin b. 1665
Debra Fowler 4/16/10
-
Re: Hugh Mahurin b. 1665
-
Re: Hugh Mahurin b. 1665
-
Re: Hugh Mahurin b. 1665
-
Re: Hugh Mahurin b. 1665
-
Re: Hugh Mahurin b. 1665
-
Re: Hugh Mahurin b. 1665
-
Re: Hugh Mahurin b. 1665
-
Re: Hugh Mahurin b. 1665