Anita, Durham was in the 1810 census and it listed 2 males and 2 females. One male was under 10 and the other was 16-25 (which I am assuming is Durham) so 1810 backwards 16-25 years would put him in the 1785-1795 range. That is how I was concluding a son based on age as opposed to a brother.
I personally always thought Daniel 1784, Arthur 1789, and Durham 178x-179x were the 3 males under 16 with Arthur in the 1790 census but of course I can't prove that. I also try to be careful with the first wife's name .. I call her Delia (like Cordelia) instead of Delilah who most point to as being the wife of a Patrick (brother of Arthur)
Guess that's why I'm interested in the marriage information you have for Arthur and the first wife.
Notify Administrator about this message?
|Home | Help | About Us | Site Index | Jobs | PRIVACY | Affiliate|
|© 2007 The Generations Network|