Re: Joshua Palmiter
-
In reply to:
Re: Joshua Palmiter
2/19/00
No, this Joshua is the great-grandson of Philip in another line.The line you want is Andrew (1739) - Joshua (abt. 1710) - Philip (abt. 1680) - John (abt. 1645).
More Replies:
-
Re: Joshua Palmiter
10/06/01
-
Early CT and RI Palmiters
Cindy S. 10/08/01
-
Re: Early CT and RI Palmiters
10/08/01
-
Re: Early CT and RI Palmiters
-
Early CT and RI Palmiters