Re: Martin Hollick-Pinkhams
-
In reply to:
Martin Hollick-Pinkhams
7/05/00
It's funny you should mention this.I noticed that a year or two ago but the sources at the LDS church didn't make the connection (Sussex Genealogies by Lewes) between Edmund Lewkenor and Elizabeth Lewkenor, wife of Thomas Stoughton.I did some original research with wills and proved the line.It will appear in print in Gary Boyd Roberts's next edition of Royal Descents (due out next year 2001).
The line is:
1. Henry III, King of England (1217-1273) m. Eleanor of Provence
2. Edmund, Earl of Lancaster m. Blanche D'Artois
3. Henry, 2nd Earl of Lancaster m. Maud de Chaworth
4. Joan of Lancaster m. John de Mowbray, Lord Mowbray
5. Eleanor Mowbray m. Roger la Warre, 3rd Lord la Warre
6. Joan La Warre m. Sir Thomas West
7. Reynold West, 6th Lord de la Warre m. Elizabeth Greyndour
8. Lady Mary West m. Sir Roger Lewknor
9. Sir Edmund Lewknor m. Jane Tirrell
10. Elizabeth Lewknor m. Sir Thomas Stoughton
11. Sir Lawrence Stoughton m. Rose Ive
12. Sir Anthony Stoughton m. Agnes Pierce
13. Rose Stoughton m. Richard Otis
14. Martha Otis m. John Pinkham
So, all Pinkhams descended from John-2 (that is, not the Nantucket Pinkhams) have this royal line (as do all the Otis descendants in NH).This is the most direct royal line.Line #8 Roger Lewkenor also is royally descended.He was the son of Sir Roger Lewknor and Eleanor Camoys, both of royal descent.Eleanor Camoys was a descendant of Henry I of England.Sir Roger was a descendant of Robert II, King of France.
More Replies:
-
Re: Martin Hollick-Pinkhams
Carey Haskell 7/07/00
-
Re: Martin Hollick-Pinkhams
7/07/00
-
Re: Martin Hollick-Pinkhams
7/09/00
-
Re: Martin Hollick-Pinkhams
7/13/00
-
Re: Thank You Martin!!!
mitty 1/07/02
-
Re: Thank You Martin!!!
Martin Hollick 1/08/02
-
Re: Thank You Martin!!!
Dan Buck 6/25/04
-
Re: Thank You Martin!!!
-
Re: Thank You Martin!!!
-
Re: Thank You Martin!!!
-
Re: Martin Hollick-Pinkhams
-
Re: Martin Hollick-Pinkhams
Justin Howery 8/05/06
-
Re: Martin Hollick-Pinkhams
Gillian 4/19/05
-
Re: Martin Hollick-Pinkhams
Gillian 2/12/06
-
Re: Martin Hollick-Pinkhams
-
Re: Martin Hollick-Pinkhams
-
Re: Martin Hollick-Pinkhams