There's a confusing record in the 1850 census that is probably being overlooked by QUAY researchers because it is incorrectly indexed. The problem is twofold:
1) "Quay" is being indexed "Guay," and
2) a stray ditto mark is causing the head-of-household to be given surname "Troup."
The record in question is:
1850: PA: Perry Co.: Oliver Twp. (Roll M432_805, pp. 507A-507B, 90/100):
John Quay " 55 M Labourer Penna
Susanna " 43 F
John Keesbury 19 M Labourer
Susanna " 17 F
Margaret " 15 F
Mary J. " 12 F
Helen " 10 F
Martha P. " 5 F
I believe the ditto mark after "Quay" is a slip by the enumerator, and it's causing the record to be indexed by the surname of the prior household, which is TROUP.
I cannot find John & Susanna QUAY in the 1860 census, but there is a John QUAY in the 1840 census of adjacent Juniata County who is the right age to be the one in 1850.
Have I interpreted this record correctly? Or does a "John Quay TROUP" really exist?
Notify Administrator about this message?
|Home | Help | About Us | Site Index | Jobs | PRIVACY | Affiliate|
|© 2007 The Generations Network|