Chat
|
Daily Search
|
My GenForum
|
Community Standards
|
Terms of Service
|
|
|
Me again. This may not line up. I used a spreadsheet.
The oldest Thomas could possibly have been born (if you are 80 and all men had their son at age 60) is 1567. The youngest (if you are 16 and all men bore children in high school) would be 1895.
Both are physically possible. Both are highly improbable. Here is the spreadsheet; BY is Birth Year:
Who Max Min Max BY Min BY
You 80 16 1927 1991
Ryan Rayburn 60 16 1867 1975
RV Rayburn 60 16 1807 1959
Pink L Raburn 60 16 1747 1943
Jasper W Raburn 60 16 1687 1927
John M Raburn 60 16 1627 1911
Thomas P Raburn 60 16 1567 1895
Notify Administrator about this message?
Followups:No followups yet |
| http://genforum.genealogy.com/raburn/messages/428.html | ||
 |
Link to GenForum Add Forum |
|