Re: We were Normans: Fitzrogers to Rogers??
-
In reply to:
We were Normans: Fitzrogers to Rogers??
David Middleton Edelen II 10/31/09
I read somewhere (can't recall the source) that the preface Fitz before a surname is indeed a sign of nobility, the Fitz meaning that this was a descendant of the nobleman by a mistress and not his legal heir.
More Replies:
-
Re: We were Normans: Fitzrogers to Rogers??
David Middleton Edelen II 11/03/09
-
Re: We were Normans: Fitzrogers to Rogers??
Brenda Templeton 11/04/09
-
Re: We were Normans: Fitzrogers to Rogers??
David Middleton Edelen II 11/05/09
-
Re: We were Normans: Fitzrogers to Rogers??
Sandra Stephens 11/09/09
-
Re: We were Normans: Fitzrogers to Rogers??
David Middleton Edelen II 11/09/09
-
Re: We were Normans: Fitzrogers to Rogers??
Sandra Stephens 11/10/09
-
Re: We were Normans: Fitzrogers to Rogers??
-
Re: We were Normans: Fitzrogers to Rogers??
-
Re: We were Normans: Fitzrogers to Rogers??
-
Re: We were Normans: Fitzrogers to Rogers??
-
Re: We were Normans: Fitzrogers to Rogers??