further to message from yesterday on James.I had make an error on the original,the unidentified fellow in the photo appears to be
Henry junior who is most likely James Father.This would explain the birthdate for James being 1894 and would appear to be accurate.
Henry junior must have left the Havelock area at some time before James was born.
|Home | Help | About Us | Site Index | Jobs | PRIVACY | Affiliate|
|© 2007 The Generations Network|