|
|
This Abraham Tooley http://www.tuley.us/cttooley/b4864.htm#P4864 would have been about 34 in 1812. Possible, but, I'd want more proof. He is the only Abraham Tooley in my database. The is no Abraham Tuley or other variation, but that does mean that much. Notify Administrator about this message?
|
|
|||||||||||||
| Home | Help | About Us | Site Index | Jobs | PRIVACY | Affiliate |
| © 2007 The Generations Network |