Re: Coat of arms
-
In reply to:
Re: Coat of arms
4/02/98
THERE IS NO COAT OF ARMS...
The reasons being that the TRAYLOR family:
-1- In France, we were not Huguenots and had no crest.
-2- In England we had no estates or castles or Wills.
-3- In England we were peons of the lowest economic scale, as indicated by the meaning of TRAYLOR: :"A person with trailing robes..."
-1- In France, we were not Huguenots and had no crest.
-2- In England we had no estates or castles or Wills.
-3- In England we were peons of the lowest economic scale, as indicated by the meaning of TRAYLOR: :"A person with trailing robes..."
In WWII, the first military officer named TRAYLOR was commissioned, he rose from the ranks, had no college; I know him. This statement has been verified at London's Kew Gardens repository where a record of all the British military or one record in the form of books printed each year, by branches of service.
In WWII, the first military officer named TRAYLOR was commissioned, he rose from the ranks, had no college; I know him. This statement has been verified at London's Kew Gardens repository where a record of all the British military or one record in the form of books printed each year, by branches of service.I will send you a generic TRAYLOR history.I have researched the name for twenty years, and have boxes of it.Also, the RANDOLPH family is not an extended TRAYLOR family ... of which I can state with a probability of 98.9 percent accuracy.
I will send you a generic TRAYLOR history.I have researched the name for twenty years, and have boxes of it.Also, the RANDOLPH family is not an extended TRAYLOR family ... of which I can state with a probability of 98.9 percent accuracy.Your reply and argument will be appreciated.CT
Your reply and argument will be appreciated.CTPS = Your name AARON, can you trace that?We are looking for other AARON TRAYLOR names.